The advent of multi-resort passes has revolutionized the ski industry, providing skiers and snowboarders with access to a plethora of mountains globally for a cost similar to that of a single resort’s season pass. Among the leaders in this trend are the Ikon, Epic, and Indy Passes, each with its own set of offerings and appeal.

The Ikon and Epic Passes have emerged as titans in the industry, catering to a broad audience with their expansive network of resorts. The Ikon Pass, for instance, includes access to over 40 destinations worldwide, ranging from local favorites to international ski meccas. It offers various tiers of access and benefits, allowing customization based on skier preferences and budget. The Epic Pass, on the other hand, boasts over 60 resorts under its umbrella, including exclusive access to all Vail Resorts-owned properties. It also provides additional perks like discounts on lodging, dining, and lessons, making it a comprehensive package for frequent skiers.

In contrast, the Indy Pass takes a different approach, focusing on providing affordable access to over 100 independent and smaller ski areas. This pass appeals particularly to those seeking less crowded slopes and a more authentic skiing experience away from the commercialized mega-resorts. Unlike the Ikon and Epic Passes, which have seen their renewal prices steadily increase, the Indy Pass has maintained its affordability, underscoring its commitment to making skiing more accessible to everyone.

As multi-resort passes gain popularity, the variation in renewal prices and benefits among these passes highlights the diverse options available to consumers. While the Ikon and Epic Passes cater to those looking for extensive resort networks and additional amenities, the Indy Pass offers a budget-friendly alternative, emphasizing the charm and unique character of independent ski areas.

Unofficial Networks Newsletter

Get the latest snow and mountain lifestyle news and entertainment delivered to your inbox.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.